What does it actually mean to be? In clinical practice and daily life, we often speak about the need to “just be” or to “stop doing so much”—but the state of being is rarely defined in physiological terms. Is it rest? Is it stillness? Is it the absence of threat?
For many
patients, being isn’t a familiar or accessible state. It may feel foreign,
uncomfortable, or even dangerous. This is especially true for those with
histories of chronic stress, survival-based patterning, or developmental
trauma. In these systems, “being” is not simply the opposite of “doing”—it is an autonomic state the body has forgotten how to enter.
To re-access
it, we must first understand what “being” is in terms of neural activation,
channel function, and fascial tone. This section outlines the key features of
the being state—both in the nervous system and in the somatic channel
structure—and contrasts them with the mobilized architecture of doing.
To
understand what it means to be—physiologically, not just poetically—we need to
begin with development.
The sinew channels, the autonomic nervous system, the limbic structures, and the early scaffolding of higher cortical centers develop together. They form a tightly interwoven regulatory network whose job is to stabilize orientation, support safety, and govern engagement with the world. These systems do not separate sensation from emotion, nor posture from thought. When they mature well, they provide a kind of coherent background hum: a state in which the body feels itself, the environment is trackable, and the self can be at rest without vigilance.
Our traditional
medical texts speak of “mental-emotional” disorders, or disruptions to the
shen, as if they were abstract overlays. But when we look more
closely—clinically and neurophysiologically—what we often find is that any
disturbance in being is, at its core, a disturbance in regulation. A shift in
tone. A quiet but persistent sympathetic charge.
The system has moved from
presence to preparedness, poised at the blocks,
usually in a state of negative anticipation. Called hypervigilance in neurosomatic circles, it is a state of hyper preparedness for the disaster that is surely coming. It often begins so early or so subtly that the patient doesn’t even that this is the yin foundation of their resting state.
This is why the
sinew channels - and more specifically
the sinew channels of the 8 Extras - can be used to affect what we experience
as “emotional” or “existential” symptoms. Because these channels reflect the
way the body has learned to relate to itself and its environment. They are the
infrastructure of being: not what we do, but how we've been shaped by experience.
Classical
Reflections on Being
The question of
being—what it is, where it resides, and how it becomes obscured—has been asked
long before the language of nervous systems or channel theory existed. In
ancient philosophy, the body and mind were often thought to be at odds, or at
best, joined by a fragile thread. Descartes' “I think, therefore I am”
reduced existence to cognition, placing identity in the domain of the rational
mind. But clinical reality suggests the opposite: many of us think constantly
and still struggle to feel that we are.
In Eastern
traditions, particularly Zen, the instruction to “just sit” or “just be” is
offered as a return to essential presence. Yet for many patients—and for many
practitioners—that invitation can feel more like a confrontation. Stillness
reveals the very thing the nervous system has spent a lifetime learning to
avoid. Muscles clench. Thoughts loop. The breath flattens. Not because the
instruction is wrong, but because the parasympathetic (yin) infrastructure to receive it is missing.
Even Socrates’ “Know
thyself” invites us into an inner world, but often bypasses the medium
through which we know: the body. Self-awareness is not a merely mental act. It is
also a somatic-visceral one, shaped by how the viscera respond, how the spine
organizes, and how the breath yields—or doesn’t. In other words, before we know
ourselves, we are shaped to exist. And if that shaping carries disruption—early
bracing, chronic vigilance, unresolved orienting patterns—then the very
experience of being can feel incomplete, or unreachable.
This is where
Chinese medicine becomes not only relevant but essential. The secondary
channels of postnatal development—the Qiao and Wei systems—are not simply
conduits for emotion or sleep. The sinew channels, their patency and tone
mirror how the body learns how to be in the world. They reflect
posture, timing, pressure, and containment. They hold the imprint of vigilance
and the potential for return.
To explore
being through this lens is not to diminish the philosophical, but to ground it.
What the ancients asked in language—Who am I? What is the self? What is rest?—we
now investigate in tone, in trajectory, in fascia, and in the quiet architecture
of the nervous system that tells us whether it's safe to land.
Definition: “Being” (Within a Neuro-Somatic and Channel-Based Framework)
Being is the baseline state of non-reactive
presence in which the body is not mobilizing toward action, not suppressing
internal sensation, and not orienting toward external threat.
In this state:
- The autonomic tone is
primarily ventral vagal (parasympathetic), not sympathetic or
dorsal-collapse
- The motor system is in neutral—no
anticipatory tension, no prepulse toward movement
- The interoceptive system is
accessible—signals from viscera, diaphragm, heart, and gut can be felt
without distortion
- The cortical system is not
driving evaluative control—especially mPFC, anterior cingulate, and
insular hyperactivity is quieted
- The midline fascial structures
are tonally receptive—not held, not collapsed
I.
Neurological Markers of “Being”
System |
State
in “Being” |
Autonomic |
Ventral
vagal dominant; sympathetic tone low, dorsal vagal not dominant |
Motor planning (cortex) |
Quiet
SMA and dACC activity; no active goal-setting or movement prep |
Insular
cortex |
Open
interoceptive registration without urgency |
Amygdala–hippocampus |
Not
signaling threat; internal environment interpreted as safe |
PAG
/ brainstem nuclei |
No
freezing or flight-readiness signaling |
DMN / limbic-cortical loop |
Present-moment
continuity, minimal narrative projection |
II. Somatic
and Channel-Based Correlates of “Being”
- Ren Mai (Conception Vessel): supports internal coherence,
parasympathetic tone, nourishment
- Yin Qiao: flexor tone without reactivity,
capacity to be inwardly oriented without collapse
- Yin Wei: emotional congruence, containment
of internal states without cortical override
- Deep midline stabilizers (multifidus, diaphragm, psoas):
support verticality and inner space without effort
Together, these
create a structural state where:
- The body feels safe to exist
without doing
- Internal sensation is not flagged
as urgent
- There is no perceived need to leave
or suppress the present moment
II. Somatic
and Channel-Based Correlates of “Being”
When the body
is in a state of being, certain tissues and channel systems function in
specific, observable ways. These aren’t vague energetic metaphors—they reflect
how the body is actually organizing itself in space and time.
Ren Mai
(Conception Vessel):
- This channel supports the midline
of the body—from the pelvis to the face—and is associated with the parasympathetic
nervous system, especially vagal tone.
Think nourishment, both systemically from the Enteric Nervous
System (post-natal qi), and locally in the microcapillary beds in the from
of oxygen exchange.
- In a state of being, the Ren is
responsive but not guarded or diminished by the Du mai (internal
rotators and multifidus). There’s a sense of open front body tone—the
belly is not clenched through Ren 15-Liv13-ST 25-GB 25, the breath can
descend into the abdomen, and the throat is not braced. (Ren-Chong
Intersection via the spiral line).
- The core of the body feels
intact and continuous, not armored, braced or collapsed.
In plain
terms:
The person can
rest in their own verticality. They don’t feel exposed in the chest or hollow
in the belly. They are not gripping themselves for structure.
Yin Qiao Mai
(Yin Motility Vessel):
- This channel runs through the inner
legs, pelvis, and abdomen, and governs flexor tone—the capacity
to bring the body inward.
- In a healthy state of being, the
inner thighs, pelvic floor, and deep abdominal wall are softly
engaged—not locked, not flaccid.
- There is a sense of inward
support—the body doesn’t need to lift up out of itself or collapse
down through the hips.
In plain
terms:
The person
doesn’t feel like they’re “falling in” or needing to brace to stay upright.
There’s a quiet tone holding the base of the torso, so they can sit or lie
still without restlessness or dissociation.
Yin Wei Mai
(Yin Linking Vessel):
- This channel connects deep
internal tissues of the chest and abdomen, and is linked to emotional
containment and internal coherence.
- When this system is working well,
the heart, diaphragm, and gut can remain responsive without being
hijacked by threat signals or over-monitoring from the brain. (HPA
Axis and chronic cortisol)
- The person can feel emotion or
sensation without needing to interpret it, explain it, or suppress it. For our neuroscientists, this is containment
of internal states without cortical override. For PVT enthusiasts, we
could consider this remaining in an undefended ventral vagus state.
In plain
terms:
The body can
have feelings without immediately trying to fix, understand, or shut them down.
There’s room for affect to move through without losing orientation.
Du Mai
(Governing Vessel)
·
Midline
Core Stabilizers (Multifidus, Diaphragm, Psoas): These are the deep muscles that
stabilize the spine and help maintain posture without effort. Patients with spasticity and rigidity in the
fascia here are often in reflex demonstration.
- In a true state of being, these
muscles are tonically active at a low level—they hold the skeleton
upright without needing to recruit the large, external muscles of
the back, neck, or shoulders.
- The breath moves through the
diaphragm with ease, and the psoas responds to gravity without
tension or slack.
In plain
terms:
The person
doesn’t have to “sit up straight” or hold themselves together. The spine
organizes itself. The breath lands. The head feels like it’s supported from
below, not suspended by the neck.
Together, these
create a structural state where:
- The body feels safe to exist
without doing
- Internal sensation is not flagged
as urgent
- There is no perceived need to leave
or suppress the present moment
Definition: “Doing” (Within a Neuro-Somatic and Channel-Based Framework) Somatic and Channel-Based Correlates of Doing (Yang-Side Expression)
Doing is a state of mobilized orientation in which the body prepares for or engages in action—externally or internally. It is characterized by anticipatory structure, directional output, and heightened regulatory control. This state may be adaptive (task engagement) or maladaptive (chronic readiness without resolution).
In this state:
- The autonomic tone is sympathetic-dominant
or blended with low vagal tone; physiological systems are tuned for action
readiness (↑ heart rate, ↑ vigilance, ↓ digestive function)
- The motor system is biased
toward goal orientation—preparatory activity in motor planning
regions (SMA, dACC); even when still, there is often low-level flexor or
extensor recruitment
- The interoceptive system is filtered
or overridden; bodily sensation is often minimized, distorted, or
registered only in relation to threat, urgency, or goal demands
- The cortical system is task-focused—especially
dlPFC, dACC, and premotor cortex directing attention, inhibition, and
planning; mPFC self-reference is diminished or performance-based
- The fascial system is tonically
braced or organized around projection—especially through the posterior
(Du), lateral (Yang Wei), or superficial extensor chains
I. Neurological Markers of “Doing” (Yang-Dominant State)
System |
State
in “Doing” |
Autonomic |
Sympathetic
dominant; increased norepinephrine release, reduced vagal tone |
Motor planning (cortex) |
Heightened
SMA and dACC activation; motor programs primed, goal-seeking circuits engaged |
Insular
cortex |
Interoception
is filtered for urgency or external relevance; diminished internal felt sense |
Amygdala–hippocampus |
Amygdala
actively monitoring threat or salience; hippocampal loops primed for
environmental mapping |
PAG
/ brainstem nuclei |
Periaqueductal
gray engaged in action-readiness modulation; brainstem arousal systems (LC,
RF) activated |
DMN / limbic-cortical loop |
Default
mode suppressed; medial PFC disengaged from self-reflection, task-positive
networks dominate |
This state
aligns with the chronic action-preparedness we’ve been exploring—where
the body and brain are continuously organized for interaction, output, or
defense, often long after the initiating stimulus has passed.
Let me know if
you'd like a side-by-side version with the Being table for reference or
inclusion in teaching materials.
Du Mai
(Governing Vessel):
- The Du Mai runs along the
spine and governs Yang activation, motor planning, and outward
expression.
- In a doing state, the Du tone is elevated,
meaning there’s increased tonic drive through the paraspinal muscles,
back of the neck, and occipital base.
- This creates a kind of "internal
exoskeleton"—the body braces along its spine to stabilize
against potential action or collapse.
In plain
terms:
The person may
feel like they’re holding themselves up from behind—tight in the back, jaw set,
tongue pushing upward. Even if they’re still, their back body is ready to
spring.
Yang Qiao
Mai (Yang Motility Vessel):
- This channel regulates extensor
tone and outward propulsion, especially through the lateral leg
line, posterior pelvis, sacrum, and occiput.
- In a heightened doing state, Yang
Qiao increases drive through the glutes, lower back, and posterior
chain—preparing for movement or alertness.
- This often creates tension in
the sacroiliac area, hamstrings, calves, and occipital ridge—places
where extension is chronically "on."
In plain
terms:
The person may
feel like they’re always subtly “leaning forward,” even when standing still.
There’s a micro-torque in the spine, a push through the feet, and a tension
across the back of the head—as if they’re bracing against gravity or
expectation.
Yang Wei Mai
(Yang Linking Vessel):
- The Yang Wei system links the Yang
channels of the limbs and torso, regulating the body’s relationship
to external time, pressure, and environmental rhythm.
- In doing mode, Yang Wei governs the
body's sense of timing, pacing, urgency, and internal clocking.
- When overactive or prolonged, it
creates a felt pressure to keep up, stay ahead, anticipate what’s
coming.
In plain
terms:
The person may
feel like time is pressing in on them. Even if nothing urgent is happening,
there’s a sense of being slightly late, not quite ready, or on
the verge of needing to act. Their body is organized around “what’s
next?” rather than “what is.”
Superficial
Back Line & Global Extensors:
- The superficial fascial line that
includes the erector spinae, glutes, hamstrings, calves, and plantar
fascia becomes dominant in prolonged Yang states.
- These muscles shift from responsive
postural tone to sustained contraction, often without awareness.
- The result is a system that
feels prepared, upright, alert—but rigid and fatigued underneath.
In plain
terms:
The person is
“on,” even when they don’t want to be. Their back is tight. Their legs don’t
rest fully into the ground. There’s a sense that they must stay vertical, stay
efficient, stay in motion—or something will fall apart.
Together, these
Yang-side systems organize the body around doing: maintaining readiness,
asserting control, projecting forward. When balanced with Yin, they support
action. But when running alone, or in the absence of rest, they produce restlessness,
bracing, vigilance, and fatigue—a state of doing without grounding.
The
Essential Conflict: Doing Versus Being
At its most
essential level, the conflict between doing and being is not philosophical—it
is structural. It lives in the interaction between the Ren Mai and the Du Mai,
between the parasympathetic drive to nourish and restore and the sympathetic
imperative to act, to stabilize, to survive. These two systems are not
antagonists; they are partners in dynamic exchange. But in many bodies,
especially those shaped by prolonged stress or threat, the exchange has
collapsed into hierarchy. Doing overrides being. Readiness becomes the
baseline. Rest becomes unfamiliar, or even intolerable.
The Ren Mai
represents more than just parasympathetic tone—it is the internal architecture
of receptivity. It governs the midline, the visceral field, the capacity to
feel one’s own breath and organs without alarm. When this system is intact and
supported, the body can yield downward. It can descend, digest, integrate. But
the Ren's activity is easily suppressed by sympathetic dominance—particularly
through the Du Mai and the sympathetic ganglia that run alongside the spine.
These structures brace the body from behind. They lift it upward, prepare it
for output, keep it upright in the face of imagined or remembered threat. They
are what allow the body to keep going, even when stillness is what's
needed.
This conflict
doesn’t only play out in the torso—it’s mirrored through the entire axial
structure. Below the neck, it shows up in the deep spinal stabilizers: the
rotatores, multifidus, psoas, and diaphragmatic layers that hold the central
column. When the body is safe, these muscles hold gently. When the body is
threatened, they grip. Above the neck, the same tension registers in the brainstem
and midbrain, where orientation, motor planning, and autonomic regulation are
shaped. The body may appear calm, but the system is still “on.” Still bracing.
Still poised for a signal that never comes.
What we call
“doing” in this model is not simply action—it is the persistent mobilization of
the system in anticipation of something unresolved. And what we call “being” is
not the absence of action—it is the presence of internal continuity without
threat. When these cannot integrate, the organism is left suspended: always
tracking, always adjusting, never landing.
At the most fundamental level, the dynamic tension between doing and being is encoded in the interaction between parasympathetic support (Ren Mai) and sympathetic inhibition (Du Mai and sympathetic chain ganglia), and balance through the HPA axis as mediated by the heart-kidney dynamic. This begins to restore vertical coherence through the spiral line of the Chong and Dai retinaculum through Ren 15.
- The Ren Mai functions as an intrinsic
“always-on” parasympathetic conduit supplying visceral nourishment,
restorative tone, and baseline regulation.
- This parasympathetic support is constantly
modulated or inhibited by sympathetic output, primarily through
the Du Mai and sympathetic ganglia, which suppress the vagal
response during stress or threat.
This yin-yang
interplay is reflected below the neck in the spinal stabilization
system:
- The deep spinal stabilizers—including
multifidus, rotatores, and other intrinsic rotators—are the
muscular protectors of the spinal cord.
- Their tonic activation patterns
reflect a balance between stabilizing being (restorative,
parasympathetic states) and mobilizing doing (sympathetic
readiness).
Above the
neck, this interplay
manifests in brainstem and midbrain centers—the hubs of autonomic
control, orientation, and higher order processing.
- These centers mediate the switching
between engagement and withdrawal, doing and being, through complex
networks including the periaqueductal gray, reticular formation,
and autonomic nuclei.
Together, these
systems form a neuro-somatic axis of control where the Ren Mai
supports intrinsic being and the Du Mai / sympathetic chain implements
adaptive doing, with both systems continuously regulating each other in
response to internal and external stimuli.
Conclusion: The Return to Being (Revised)
To “be” is not to withdraw from life’s demands, nor to float in some idealized stillness. It is to inhabit a form that is not contorted by anticipatory action. It is to remain within one’s own vertical axis, coherent in breath, posture, and internal signal, even as the world moves.
In clinical terms, this means restoring the body’s capacity to not prepare. To let the Ren Mai speak without being silenced by sympathetic override. To allow the Yin Qiao to gather inward tone without collapse. To inhabit the spine from within, rather than bracing from behind. And to regulate emotion through somatic containment, not cortical control.
Most patients do not need to be taught how to be—they need to be reintroduced to the conditions that make being possible. This is where our medicine excels. It reaches into the pre‑cognitive scaffolding of experience: the channels, the fascia, the autonomic set‑points, the shape‑memory of the self. By treating not just what the patient is doing, but how they are held in the doing, we create a path back to being.
As The Undefended Self teaches, “There is a real self that equals neither your negative aspects, nor your adamant self‑judgment, nor the pretense that covers up the negativity. To find this real self is our concern.” That “real self” is one unbound by primitive defense, one that emerges when anticipatory threat responses are no longer baseline.
And in that return, something essential is recovered—not just ease, but a reconnection to presence.
References
- Deadman, P. , Al-Khafaji, M. (2007). A Manual of Acupuncture (2nd ed.). Journal of Chinese Medicine Publications.
- Fratkin, J. (n.d.). More Divergent Channel Treatment (Part 4). Dr. Jake Fratkin. Retrieved March 13, 2025, from https://drjakefratkin.com/3-level-najom/part-4-more-divergent-channel-treatment/
- Levine, P. (1997). Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma. North Atlantic Books.
- Levine, P. A. (2010). In an Unspoken Voice: How the Body Releases Trauma and Restores Goodness. North Atlantic Books.
- Low, R. H. (1984). The Secondary Vessels of Acupuncture: A Detailed Account of Their Energies, Meridians, and Control Points. HarperCollins.
- Lowen, A. (1975). Bioenergetics: The Revolutionary Therapy That Uses the Language of the Body to Heal the Problems of the Mind. Penguin Books.
- Maciocia, G. (2005). The Foundations of Chinese Medicine: A Comprehensive Text for Acupuncturists and Herbalists (2nd ed.). Churchill Livingstone.
- Mastagova, I. (2005). Integrating Primitive Reflexes for Neurodevelopment. Neurotherapeutics Press.
- Moffitt, J. (2025). Neuro-Somatic Mapping of Emotional States: The Interplay of Bioenergetic Character Structures, Fascia, and Autonomic Regulation. LinkedIn. January 2025.
- Moffitt, J. (2025). The Role of TCM Sinew Channels in Emotional Integration and Vagal Tone Restoration. LinkedIn. January 2025.
- Myers, T. W. (2020). Anatomy Trains: Myofascial Meridians for Manual and Movement Therapists. Churchill Livingstone.
- Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation. Norton & Company.
- Pryor, K. (2020). Ten Fingers, Ten Toes, Twenty Things Everyone Needs to Know: Neuroplasticity for Children. Karen Pryor Publications.
- Rosen, J. (2020). Unshakable: Healing the Roots of Trauma. Mindful Living Press.
- Soulié de Morant, G. (1939). L’Acupuncture Chinoise. Éditions Payot.
- Stecco, C. (2015). Functional Atlas of the Human Fascial System. Elsevier Health Sciences.
- Thesenga, S. (1994). The undefended self: Living the Pathwork of spiritual wholeness. Pathwork Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment